Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer

Law Offices of Russell J Matson, PC - Criminal Defense

Free Initial Consultation

Call or TEXT Now!

(781) 817-6332

  • Home
  • Case Wins
  • Massachusetts Criminal Charges
  • Criminal Court Process
    • Clerk Magistrate’s Hearing
    • Frequently Asked Questions About Criminal Charges
    • How to Seal A Criminal Record in Massachusetts
    • Massachusetts CORI Reform
  • About
  • Blog

Do Terrorism “Fusion Centers” Make You Feel Safer?

May 20, 2013 Leave a Comment

Many safety measures and specific methods of counter-terrorism have come under scrutiny following the bombings at the Boston Marathon. One of these relates to fusion centers. Defined by the Department of Homeland Security as “focal points within state and local environments, for the receipt, analysis, gathering, and sharing of threat-related information”, these information hubs have been created to fill in the holes between information know by an anti-terrorism agency but not by local law enforcement, or vice versa.

In other words, fusion centers are supposed the be the exact solution to the kind of gap in information sharing that may have, in part, led to the Marathon bombings.

Boston Regional Intelligence Center

Boston Regional Intelligence Center

Massachusetts has two fusion centers: the Commonwealth Fusion Center (CFC) and the Boston Regional Intelligence Center (BRIC). The latter in particular, run by the city, was a DHS-created clearinghouse whose number one priority was being aware of terrorist threats that could affect a city included in the 9/11 assault, via a hijacked airplane.

Yet, the BRIC was unaware of existing investigation and FBI reports relating to Tamerlan Tsarnaev. This, according to BRIC themselves, who claimed they weren’t “privy to the tip” that the FBI was investigating Tsarnaev as a potential threat in 2011.

Whether BRIC was caught flat footed or the FBI simply didn’t share the information is unclear. Spokesman David Procopio said that even if the FBI had put BRIC on notice that Tsarnaev was under examination, the fusion center was unlikely to highlight – and police were unlikely to act – as the FBI officially determined that he didn’t pose a threat.

In response, the FBI stated that direct communication to Boston police was unnecessary in light of the existence of the fusion centers, whose main function lie in access to information without the need to have it directly related by federal agencies. The Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) in Boston, in particular, was pointed as a source from which the fusion center can pull information and connect the dots. The FBI was resolute that the information was available, if not easily accessible, to both BRIC and the CFC.

Perhaps there is a larger issue that obviates any point to the blame game. In 2012, a senate subcommittee studied the effects of fusion centers, determining that few of their positive effects overrode some of the negatives: from excessive costs to violations of civil liberties. For this reason, the ACLU of Massachusetts, among others, have increased calls to reconsider the use of fusion centers as a whole. If the information is otherwise available through the JTTF, and if law enforcement haven’t found it convenient and/or helpful to use fusion centers to access such information, wouldn’t it be easier to cut out the middle man – a middle man that arguably infringes on the most basic of civil liberties.

To the previous point, fusion centers are arguably best known for leading to racial profiling at the Logan International airport in Boston. They have also been criticized for blurring a line between public, private and military enterprise when it comes to combating terrorism, as well as mining data in contravention of basic individual privacy.

Failings aside, there just doesn’t seem to be the right impetus behind upholding a costly program that seems redundant, ineffective, and serves as no more than argumentative fodder between federal and local law enforcement looking for someone to blame.

 For questions of criminal law in Massachusetts, contact the Law Offices of Russell J Matson, PC.

Please Share!Share on Facebook
Facebook
0Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Reddit
Reddit
0Email this to someone
email

Filed Under: criminal charges Tagged With: civil liberties, police

Free Consultation

Contact our attorneys for a free legal case evaluation on any criminal charge by calling:


(781) 817-6332


Receive our free legal defense consultation and case evaluation. We'll explain what you are facing in plain language, and tell you how we can help.

How to Win a Clerk Magistrate’s Hearing

I wrote the book on winning your case at a Clerk Magistrate's hearing. My book on How to beat a Clerk Magistrate's Hearing.
Complete this Form





Buy my book on Amazon

Or just email me and I'll send you a copy.
Seriously.
Don't really buy it. Just submit my web form above with your mailing address and we will send you one for free! No obligation.

How to Beat Your Clerk Magistrate's Hearing

$9.97
Shop Now

Criminal Procedures

  • Do I Need a Lawyer for an Arraignment in Massachusetts?
  • How to Avoid a Criminal Record – Pretrial Probation vs Pretrial Diversion
  • What To Do While You Are Waiting For a Clerk Magistrate’s Hearing Date
  • I Know I Am Guilty. Should I Just Plead Guilty in Court?
  • How Much Does a Criminal Lawyer Cost in Massachusetts?

OUI Charges

  • OUI (First Offense)
  • OUI Second Offense
  • OUI Third Offense (and Greater)
  • OUI Marijuana or Operating Under the Influence of Drugs
  • Massachusetts OUI Penalties: Third, Fourth and Fifth Offenses
  • Worried About Your OUI? Dealing with bad circumstances in OUI cases
  • How To Work Out a DUI Plea Deal in Massachusetts
  • Arrested for Drunk Driving? Taking the Case to Trial

Criminal Charges

  • Assault & Battery
  • Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon (ABDW)
  • Bad Checks / Fraud
  • Burglary / Breaking and Entering
  • Child Endangerment
  • Hate Crimes
  • Disorderly Conduct
  • Domestic Violence
  • Drug Possession
  • Drug Possession – Class B Substance – Cocaine
  • Drug Possession – Marijuana
  • Drug Possession with Intent to Distribute
  • Failure to Appear
  • Firearms / Weapons Offenses
  • Harassment / Stalking
  • Hit and Run / Leaving the Scene of an Accident with Property Damage
  • Impersonating a Police Officer or Other Peace or Investigative Officer
  • Indecent Assault and Battery
  • Indecent Exposure
  • Larceny / Shoplifting / Theft
  • Leaving the Scene of an Accident with Personal Injury
  • Minor in Possession of Alcohol or False Identification
  • Motor Vehicle Homicide Citation
  • Operating to Endanger / Negligent Operation (Reckless Driving)
  • Open and Gross Lewdness
  • Prostitution
  • Property Damage / Malicious Damage
  • Resisting Arrest
  • Sexual Assault / Rape – Laws and Penalties
  • Suspended License
  • Solicitation – Engaging in Sexual Conduct For a Fee
  • Trespassing
  • Threatening to Commit a Crime
Russell J. MatsonReviewsout of 5 reviews

Copyright © 2022 Law Offices of Russell J. Matson, PC